Starring: Billy Crystal, John Goodman, Helen Mirren, Steve Buscemi, Peter Sohn, Charlie Day
I am not one to watch entertainment talk/news shows, specifically those that run stories on the most irrelevant of celebrity news like Entertainment Tonight. However, bored and having nothing else to watch, I decided to watch The Insider, now titled OMG Insider for some reason. Why does this relate to Monsters University? Well, one of the stories covered was the box office, where Monsters University was #1. One of the anchors, whose name I do not know and don’t feel like researching, stated that he saw it and that, in a very annoyed/condescending voice, “it was cute.” It bugged me that all he could say was that it was cute. Nice would have worked, or sweet, or even good. I just felt that cute wasn’t the word that could describe what many have said is a step in the right direction for Pixar.
Then
I actually saw the movie and well…I do have to agree on some terms with him.
Cute is a good word to describe Monsters University. Not that that makes it
bad, far from it. While it doesn’t delve into edgy territory until the surprising
third act, Monsters University is a cutesy children’s film that does its job:
expand on the Monsters Inc. world and give a better in sight on how two of
Pixar’s most popular characters, Mike and Sulley, became friends. The easiest
questions to answer are: does Monsters University surpass the original? and
should it be considered one of the studios masterpieces along with the Toy
Story franchise, The Incredibles, and Wall-E?, both of which can be answered
with a no. But one important question that needs to be answered is this: is
Monsters University a sign that Pixar is no longer the animation studio to beat
or that Pixar, after a mediocre film that many detest and a sequel that nobody
wanted then and now, is on its way to a comeback? Luckily for us and the
studio, the answer is the latter.
The
plot is simple. Set 10 years before the events of Monsters Inc, the story
follows Mike and Sulley during their freshman year of college. Starting off as
bitter enemies, they must work together to get back into the scaring program at
Monsters University by winning the Scare Games, a series of events that test
the scaring abilities of the fraternity’s and sorority’s at MU, with their fraternity Oozma Kappa, a frat filled
with the rejects of Monsters University. A plot many have described as “The
Internship with monsters” and “the monster version of Revenge of the Nerds,”
the plot seems to be one seen before, although with a few tweaks.
Pixar’s
first prequel, the movie did a nice job with telling the story of Mike and
Sulley’s friendship. Many have complained about the sequel-itis the film
presents us (since Mike did mention that they knew each other in elementary
school at the beginning of MI), but in my opinion the film completely erases
that, making it feel like they truly did meet in college. It does feel by the
book at the beginning, not taking many risks with the plotline and giving us
the story that we expect. However, the third act becomes a new film entirely.
The third act was something of a wonder and felt like an experts course in how
Pixar has become one of the animation greats. Each twist in it enhanced the
film, with its horror monsters homage and unexpected change of events at the
very end. If it wasn’t for the third act, the film would have ended on a
predictable and mundane note, but that one turn of events made the movie for
me.
Everyone
in the voice cast is brilliant. John Goodman and Billy Crystal, despite both
being in their early to mid-sixties, easily slide back into the roles of Sulley
and Mike, albeit their younger versions. Most of the film I never thought “Oh
that’s John Goodman/Billy Crystal’s voice,” making it feel like it hasn’t been
12 years since the original came out, as if nothing has changed. Helen Mirren
also does great work as Dean Hardscrabble. It didn’t feel out of place, like
many celebrity voice castings of recent memory, and her voice fit perfectly
with the winged, centipede-legged Dean. Besides John Goodman and Billy Crystal,
the only returning cast member that is worth mentioning is Steve Buscemi as
Randall, known as Randy in this film. Despite having very little to do (which I
will touch on later), Buscemi is great, as he is in most of his voice work. The
rest of star studded cast, including Nathan Fillion as the pompous jock Johnny,
Aubrey Plaza as the gothic Greek Council president, and Charlie Day as OK
member Art (who gives us one of the most quotable lines in the film), is
phenomenal, especially coming from Day, Sean Hayes, Dave Foley, Peter Sohn,
Joel Murray, and Julia Sweeney as the rest of Oozma Kappa and the mother of one
of the members.
Character
wise the film did well. Not many characters get much character development,
save Mike and Sulley and the transformation of the OK frat from weak underdogs
to impressive scarers, but the characters we want to route for are likeable and
the changes Mike and Sulley go through do build a strong foundation for the
film. Some characters actions (mainly a prank on the Oozma Kappa members
involving glitter, teddy bears, and an obvious reference to Carrie) are
questionable to say the least, but they don’t detract that much from the story.
However, my biggest problem character wise was how Randall fit into the story.
Randall is my favorite character in the original and being both a Randall and
Steve Buscemi fan I was excited about him being in the prequel. After seeing
the trailers and reading several message boards, I expected a lot more than was
given. The friendship between him and Mike is barely explored, there’s no
explanation to why he was chosen to be in the rival frat, and the way they set
up the rivalry between him and Sulley is lazy with just one line before *POOF*
he’s gone from the film. Many have complained about Randall’s lack of
motivation in MI (which I can agree on to some degree) and there was potential
for a great side plot that would have not only given some explanation as to why
he is the way he is, but also would have connected with a lot of people. Pixar could have given a better reason for his
detest for Sulley than a throwaway line.
Other
than that, there is not much that I can say that isn’t a rehash of what other
reviewers have said. The movie is beautiful to look at with bright, bold colors
that appeal to the eye of those young and old. The story and writing, while it
does borrow a lot from other movies, is very good, keeping the heart of the
original while adding more to the Monsters Inc. mythos. The winks to the
original and cameos from characters from the original that aren’t Sulley, Mike,
and Randall are perfect. Hearing the music from specifically the garbage block
scene brought me back to my childhood and seeing a cameo from a certain slug
brought a giant smile to my face. There are some good jokes, but for anyone
over the age of 9, possibly 10, many will fall flat. I saw the film in a packed
theater with several kids and I didn’t hear many giggles, let alone a ton of
laughter, throughout the movie. I can only remember a few spots where everyone
collectively laughed, the only time the theater burst into laughter was near the
end during the last OK meeting. There aren’t any tearjerker scenes or scenes
that will make you cry, which is actually kind of refreshing for me. The last
Pixar movie I saw was Toy Story 3 and the one before that was Up and now
everytime I see the begnnning of Up or the end of Toy Story 3, I burst into
tears. Pixar movies, along with most animated films, tend to add a big sad
moment and it has become a bit cliché to me, so seeing Monsters University, the
prequel to a film with a pretty good sad moment near the end, trade in tears
for laughs is great.
I
had high hopes for Monsters University. Monsters Inc. is not only my favorite
Pixar film, but also one of my favorite movies, and due to the disappointment Cars
2 was and how outraged fans seemed to be over Brave’s recent best animated
feature win at the Oscars, Pixar desperately needed a good movie to get them
out of the phase they were in. I never expected it to be better than Monsters
Inc, just expand on its universe. Most importantly, I wanted Pixar to be at
least start making their way back to their title of best animation studio. Yes,
the film has serious character development issues, along with some jokes that
fall flat and characters that could have had a better reason to be in the film,
but it also has a great voice cast, great character development and pacing for
both Mika and Sulley and their friendship, and a third act that solidified the
film as more than an underdog story. While I don’t find it the best out of
Pixar’s roster or it’s sequels, but it isn’t the worst and it gives me a reason
to say something that I have been hoping to say for a very long time: welcome
back Pixar.
~Indie Princess
No comments:
Post a Comment